Marion Municipal UtilitiesMarion, Indiana
Combined Sewer Overflows & Long Term Control PlanThe following is a guide designed to
update you on a major pollution issue with the Mississinewa River, and why
we must act to solve the problem. Almost every time it rains, raw sewage mixed with storm water from combined sewers overflows into the Mississinewa River. Marion Utilities is preparing to address this problem, however, it may require significant financial expenditures that will affect the whole city. WHAT IS A COMBINED SEWER
|
|
1. Storm sewers carry only storm water runoff. |
| 2. Sanitary sewers carry only sanitary waste. |
| 3. Combined sewers carry sanitary waste and storm water runoff. |
The theory behind the combination sewer was that during dry weather it could transport sanitary waste to the treatment plant. During wet weather, the sanitary waste would be flushed to the treatment plant by the influx of stormwater, and as the sewer reached capacity, the stormwater would overflow to the river. However, in reality, a large amount of sanitary waste also discharges to the river. This discharge is called a Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO).
Sanitary waste discharged to the river can have a drastic impact on the water quality of the river. High concentrations of metals from industrial discharges such as zinc, lead, copper, nickel, chromium, cadmium and mercury, low levels of dissolved oxygen due to the biological breakdown of organic waste and high levels of bacteria and pathogens can make the river unfit for recreational use, impair the rivers ecology, and in extreme cases, cause fish kills.
The US EPA recognized the potential danger that CSO's and other discharges posed to the nations water ways and passed the "Clean Water Act" in 1972. This Act no longer made it legal to construct combined sewer systems. However, this Act did not require CSO communities to reduce the number of combined sewers contained in their system, therefore communities continued to maintain and operate existing combined sewer systems.
Realizing that more needed to be done to improve the water quality of the nations streams and rivers, the US EPA developed a national CSO Policy in 1989. With revisions in 1994, this policy set forth 9 controls which every CSO community must follow. These nine minimum controls are:
|
1. Proper operation and
maintenance of the collection system - This insures that each
community has a preventative maintenance program to keep the system
operating efficiently. |
|
2. Maximum use of the system
for storage of excess flows - The more sewage that can be stored in
the sewer pipes, the less that will be discharged to the rivers. |
| 3.
Review and modification of industrial pretreatment programs - This
involves working with the industries to reduce discharge volume and/or
metal concentrations. |
|
4. Maximization of flow
through the wastewater treatment plant - Most treatment plants are
capable of handling more than their design capacity for short periods
of time without affecting the quality of the effluent or harming plant
operations. The more flow that can be brought through the
treatment plant, the less that will be discharged to the river through
a CSO. |
| 5.
Prohibition of CSO discharges during dry weather - Some communities
have combined sewer systems that are so hydraulically overloaded that
overflows would occur without a rain event. |
| 6.
Control of solid and floatable material in CSO discharge - This is
mainly for aesthetic reasons to reduce the amount of trash and debris
discharging to the river. |
| 7.
Establishment of pollution prevention programs - Recycling, street
sweeping, trash pick-up, and programs such as "Tox-away Day" all
reduce the amount of trash that can eventually end up in the sewer
system, cause maintenance problems, or be discharged to the river. |
| 8.
Public notification of CSO occurrences/impacts - This involves public
education on CSO impacts and possible dangers. Signage is placed
at each CSO for identification with phone numbers to call if
discharging is noticed during dry weather. |
| 9. Submission of a Stream Reach Characterization Evaluation Report (SRCER) to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. This study measures the effectiveness of the first eight minimum controls, and identifies the impacts that a community's CSO's have on the river. One year after submission of the SRCER, each community must submit a Long Term Control Plan (LTCP) designed to reduce/eliminate the CSO's. |
Marion's sanitary waste collection system consists of approximately 80% combined sewers with 38 miles of sanitary sewer and 133 miles of combined sewers. Some of these sewers are over 100 years old. It should be noted that previous to the 1940's, there was no Wastewater Treatment Plant in Marion and all sewers eventually discharged directly to the river. At one time the system contained over 15 CSO's, however through a program of regular maintenance, the collection system now contains only nine combined sewer overflows. It is estimated that, on average, 100 million gallons of raw sewage mixed with stormwater discharges from these on an annual basis.
Sampling along the Mississinewa River has indicated that the metal concentrations and other water quality parameters are within the normal standards with the exception of the E-coli levels. E-coli levels are higher than the acceptable standard (235 colonies/100mL) during dry weather and climb even higher during storm events.
Since 1995, Marion Utilities has installed over 8 million dollars worth of new sanitary and storm mains. This has accounted for approximately 700 acres of storm/sanitary sewer separation. Additionally, the Utilities has smoke tested over 12 miles of sewer to identify other sources of storm water in the sanitary sewer system such as down spouts, perimeter drains, and cracked or leaky joints on private service lines. The Utilities is in the final stages of a project that will allow us to remove CSO #004E from our system which contributes approximately 25% of the total annual volume discharged. However, the work is only beginning. The Utilities is currently preparing the Long Term Control Plan which is due to submitted to IDEM by December of 2002. We are asking for an extension of this deadline for 2 reasons. First, the amount of work that was being completed during the Stream Reach Characterization Evaluation Report and that has occurred since will make it difficult to determine how much more construction will be necessary as part of the Long Term Control Plan. Second, the State of Indiana's guidance document for this plan has not been finalized as of this date.
Without going into much detail, the LTCP is basically a master plan to reduce or eliminate CSO's. This is to be accomplished taking into account the following criteria:
| 1. Sensitive/recreational areas are given the highest priority. |
|
Recreational areas
where the public can come into contact with contaminated water will
require elimination of CSO's in and upstream of that area. |
| 2. Public Participation. |
|
The community is to
be involved in the prioritization and selection of possible controls
through public meetings and citizens advisory groups. |
| 3. Evaluation of an array of alternatives. |
|
A variety of
alternatives will be evaluated from "no action" to complete
elimination of all CSO's taking into account "cost vs. performance"
considerations. |
| 4. Affordability analysis. |
|
Using federal guidelines, the ability of the community to pay for the controls and over what period of time will be determined. |
There are 4 basic strategies a city can take to address sewage overflows:
| 1. Using the existing sewer system to store more sewage during wet weather. |
|
In most instances
the sewer pipes are not completely full before starting to overflow to
the river. CSO weirs can be raised or other mechanical devices
may be used to ensure these pipes are full before they overflow,
however, caution must be taken not to allow the pipes to get too full
allowing sewer back-ups into basements or on streets. |
| 2.
Expanding the Wastewater Treatment Plant to treat more flow during wet
weather. |
|
Marion's treatment
plant has a design capacity of 12.0 MGD, however, it can handle over
20 MGD for a short period of time. Expanding the Plant's
capacity will allow more sewage to be treated and allow less overflow
to the river. |
| 3. Build storage facilities throughout the collection system. |
|
Underground tanks
can be constructed to store sewage during rain events then release it
after the rain is over. |
| 4. Separation of storm and sanitary sewers. |
|
Treatment of "clear" stormwater at the wastewater treatment plant can be very expensive and uses up valuable capacity in the sewer collection system. Separating combined sewers into a sanitary system and a storm system is an effective way of reducing or eliminating CSO's, however, it is important to remember that in the future there may be stormwater regulations that could require cities the size of Marion to address pollution concerns with these stormwater discharges. |
Marion's Long Term Control Plan will most likely involve three if not all four of these strategies. Completing the goals outlined in Marion's Long Term Control Plan will require significant financial investments. However, this will be necessary to improve our water ways, enhance the river's recreational uses and follow the US EPA's Regulatory Guidance.
CSO Public Notification Program